Aircraft F-404 (f/a-18 A-d) Engine Parts

(Page 6) End item NSN parts page 6 of 9
Part Number
NSN
NIIN
10159979 O-ring
011149262
10160032 Special Bracket
012845119
10160033 Engine Accessory Bracket
013526413
10160036 Grooved Clamp Coupling
011232283
10160039 Support Electrical Cable Bracket
011397150
10160040 Support Electrical Cable Bracket
011351404
10160044 Support Special Bracket
011397149
10160045 Special Clip
011696194
10160054 Screw Thread Insert
013117053
10160123 Ring Spacer
011278971
10160152 Packing Retainer
012789019
10160170 Retaining Ring
011542976
10160210 Countersunk Spacer
012952480
10160227 Wire Wound Fixed Resistor
011142235
10160366 Induct Wire Wound Fixed Resistor
011146471
10160401 Induct Wire Wound Fixed Resistor
011146477
10160403 Induct Wire Wound Fixed Resistor
011146480
10160423 Induct Wire Wound Fixed Resistor
011157163
10160426 Induct Wire Wound Fixed Resistor
012249532
10172925 Induct Wire Wound Fixed Resistor
011146458
Page: 6

Engine, Aircraft F-404 (f/a-18 A-d)

Picture of Aircraft F-404 (f/a-18 A-d) Engine

The General Electric F404 and F412 are a family of afterburning turbofan engines in the 10,500–19,000 lbf (47–85 kN) class (static thrust). The series are produced by GE Aviation. Partners include Volvo Aero, which builds the RM12 variant. The F404 was developed into the larger F414 turbofan, as well as the experimental GE36 civil propfan.

GE developed the F404 for the F/A-18 Hornet, shortly after losing the competition for the F-15 Eagle's engine to Pratt & Whitney, and losing the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) competition to the Pratt & Whitney F100 powered YF-16. For the F/A-18, GE based the F404 on the YJ101 engine they had developed for the Northrop YF-17, enlarging the bypass ratio from .20 to .34 to enable higher fuel economy. The engine was designed with a higher priority on reliability than performance. Cost was the main goal in the design of the engine.

GE also analyzed "throttle profiles" and found that pilots were changing throttle settings far more often than engineers previously expected; putting undue stress on the engines. GE also sought with the F404 a design that would avoid compressor stalls and other engine failures, and would respond quickly to control inputs; a common complaint of pilots converting from propeller planes to jets were that early turbojets were not responsive to changes in thrust input. GE executives Frederick A. Larson and Paul Setts also set the goal that the new engine would be smaller than the F-4's GE J79, but provide at least as much thrust, and cost half as much as the P&W F100 engine for the F-16.

立即比較»
清楚 | 隱藏